• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Great Leadership by Dan
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Recent
  • About
  • eBook
menu icon
go to homepage
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Recent
  • About
  • eBook
  • search icon
    Homepage link
    • Blog
    • Popular
    • Recent
    • About
    • eBook
  • ×

    You are here Home » leadership

    Create Eagles – Not Ducks When it Comes to Policies

    Last updated on Jul 9, 2020 by Dan McCarthy · This post may contain affiliate links

    Guest
    post from S. Chris Edmonds:
    Most
    stupid policies don’t start out that way. They are intended to “protect &
    serve” but can evolve into something not good.
    There’s
    a story by Wayne Dyer about eagles and ducks. In organizations, ducks are those
    employees who are bogged down in the stupid policies, i.e. rules that no longer
    serve. They are helpless to change things that don’t work. Ducks quack, “That’s
    not my job,” and “I’m sorry, that’s our policy,” and “My computer won’t let me
    remove that charge from your account,” etc.
    Eagles
    soar above the crowd, doing great things for customers and the company. They
    don’t get mired in policies that don’t work; they maneuver around stupid
    policies to serve the customer and the company fairly.
    Years
    ago I discovered something about organizations and policy creation.
    The
    client was a municipal government – city, not county or state. I was teaching a
    leadership program and participants were very pleased with the models, tools,
    and techniques the program presented.
    At
    one point during the afternoon, one woman – let’s call her Joyce – shared her frustrations
    with a woman in her office (who was not attending my program). Joyce explained
    that this peer of hers had a unique role which placed her in a “gatekeeper”
    position.
    This
    peer – let’s call her Roberta – touched key projects at key times, moving
    paperwork to decision-makers for approval, scheduling meetings of
    decision-makers with project staff, etc. Roberta tended to move more quickly on
    activities that her “work friends” would benefit from, and she allowed other
    activities to sit, untouched -  sometimes
    for days.
    Roberta’s
    inconsistencies caused much consternation to Joyce and others in the room. I
    was about to inquire about how the group has tried to address these issues when
    Joyce stated, “And Roberta is ‘Employee of the Month’ this month!”
    I’m
    certain that my shock was quite apparent; I felt like my jaw dropped to the
    floor. I sputtered a moment then asked Joyce, “Why would you select Roberta as
    ‘Employee of the Month’?” Joyce looked at me and calmly said, “It was her
    turn.”
    The
    class and I spoke awhile about stupid policies; this “EOTM” policy certainly
    qualified. Employee of the Month programs typically do not celebrate great
    contributions or performance; they celebrate moderate contribution and (mostly)
    tenure. Why would an organization want just ONE Employee of the Month? Wouldn’t
    you want dozens of terrific employees, all recognized for doing great things
    every day for customers and for the company?
    This
    particular practice is not unique to municipalities. We’ve all experienced this
    “good intentions gone wrong” policy issue in all kinds of organizations, all
    across the globe.
    Impact
    of Stupid Policies
    Every
    team member knows which policies are stupid; they talk about them with their
    peers all the time! Customers know – and some are quick to point out how dumb
    those policies are. Stupid policies:
    ●     demoralize staff
    ●     Alienate customers
    ●     Cost your company hard dollar
    profits
    How
    can you reduce the negative impact and undesirable consequences of stupid
    policies?
    1.
    Spend an hour or two each week, seeking input from team members about policies
    that inhibit great performance.
    2.
    As you discover stupid policies, eliminate them – or, at least, refine them so
    they have NO negative impact on great performance.
    One
    company created a “stupid policies” group whose sole purpose was to identify
    and eliminate policies that inhibit good decisions, full presence, and full
    commitment. They celebrated their first year’s successes – cutting a policy
    manual down from 3″ to 30 pages – with a huge dinner party!
    S. Chris Edmonds is
    a sought-after speaker, author, and executive consultant. After a 15-year
    career leading successful teams, Chris founded his consulting company, The Purposeful Culture Group, in
    1990. Chris has also served as a senior consultant with The Ken Blanchard
    Companies since 1995. He is the author or co-author of seven books, including
    Amazon best sellers The
    Culture Engine
     and Leading at a Higher Level with Ken Blanchard. Learn
    from his blog posts, podcasts, assessments, research, and videos at http://drivingresultsthroughculture.com.
    Get free resources plus weekly updates from Chris by subscribing here. 

    « 5 Steps to Build a Disruption Proof Business Model
    What Makes a High-Performance Leader? »
    AFTER ENTRY

    Reader Interactions

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Primary Sidebar

    dan-mccarthy-great-leadership-by-dan

    About Dan

    Dan is an expert in leadership and management development. For over 20 years Dan has helped thousands of leaders and aspiring leaders improve their leadership capabilities. Read More

    ebook-dan-mccarthy

    Trending:

    • Top 12 Development Goals for Leaders
    • How to Write a Great Individual Development Plan (IDP)
    • 25 Great Leadership Development Quotes
    • The Performance and Potential Matrix (9 Box Model) – an Update

    Footer

    ↑ back to top

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Pinterest
    • Home
    • About
    • Contact

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Copyright © 2022

    • Disclosure
    • Privacy Policy